This Board Rocks
 

Go Back   This Board Rocks > Daily Hits > News Of The Day & Politics

News Of The Day & Politics

If You Can't Compete, Cheat


This is a discussion on If You Can't Compete, Cheat within the News Of The Day & Politics forums, part of the Daily Hits category!
Yet more evidence that we should separate our governing systems. Let people move to the parts of the continent where ...



Sponsored Ads

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-25-13, 10:11 AM   #1 (permalink)
Full Access Member
 
tharan000's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 11,838
If You Can't Compete, Cheat

Yet more evidence that we should separate our governing systems. Let people move to the parts of the continent where they can be either represented by democracy or by white guys.

From the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:

Quote:
GOP battle plan: If you can’t compete, cheat

Taking its cue from the likes of Lance Armstrong, dozens of Atlanta Public School teachers and Bernie Madoff, the Republican Party is embracing a bold new solution to its political problems:

If you can’t compete, cheat.

And cheat big.

In Virginia, for example, Barack Obama has carried the state and its 13 electoral votes in the last two elections, becoming the first Democrat to carry the state back-to-back since Franklin Roosevelt. But rather than work harder to win back the state, or adopt policies more relevant to the needs of its voters, Republicans are advancing another solution.

Under a bill passed out of a state Senate subcommittee this week, Virginia would no longer award its electoral votes to the candidate who won the most votes. Instead, the state’s electoral votes would be allocated by congressional district, which are heavily gerrymandered to favor the GOP.

Had the bill been law in November, Barack Obama would have been awarded just four of the state’s 13 electoral votes, even though he carried the state.

Mitt Romney, who lost the state, would have won nine electoral votes, more than twice as many as the winner. As one observer put it, Virginia is in the process of moving from a winner-takes-all system to a loser-takes-most system.

The bill now moves to a Senate committee, where Republicans hold a 10-5 advantage. It would then be voted on by the entire Senate, which is split 20-20 between the parties. A tie would be broken by the lieutenant governor, a Republican. Republicans control the Virginia House and governor’s office.

But as one GOP senator assured the Richmond Times-Dispatch, “There’s no partisan ax to grind here.”

Presumably, there is also no partisan ax-grinding underway in five other large states won by Obama, where Republicans are pushing similar legislation.

The scheme is so blatant in its election-stealing intent that it has pushed Larry Sabato, the well-known and nonpartisan elections expert at the University of Virginia, to condemn it in unusually harsh terms. The plan is “a corrupt and cynical maneuver to frustrate popular will and put a heavy thumb — the whole hand, in fact — on the scale for future Republican candidates.”

(BTW, the sheer gall of this effort adds credence to Democratic claims that the GOP has been trying to game the system in other ways, such as restricting access to the ballot box.)

The Republican Party faces a choice, Sabato writes. It can choose the Reaganesque, optimistic approach, “convinced that it can win the future by embracing it.” Or it can turn to a Nixonian attitude in which “it sees enemies everywhere, feels overwhelmed by electoral trends, and thinks it can win only by cheating, by subverting the system and stacking the deck in its favor."

Sabato also cites the work of a colleague and fellow political scientist, Alan Abramovitz of Emory University, who has studied the potential impact of the GOP scheme. As Abramovitz notes, Obama won the popular vote, and thus the electoral votes, in Virginia, Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Florida and Wisconsin. In all six states, Republicans are eying passage of some version of the Virginia plan.

Had it been in place in 2012, Abramovitz concludes, the Virginia plan would have given Obama just 45 electoral votes in those states, while Romney would have reaped 61. And again, Obama carried all six states.

Once upon a time, such a scheme would have been unthinkable. Once upon a time, no major political party would have dared to be associated with it, because the bald-faced thievery is too obvious. Even Nixon would be appalled at the shamelessness of it all.

But in these times, Republican National Chairman Reince Priebus has publicly endorsed the election-stealing plan. “I think it’s something that a lot of states that have been consistently blue that are fully controlled red ought to be looking at,” he said this month.

Such is the desperation and moral bankruptcy of the party that he leads.
GOP battle plan: If you can’t compete, cheat | Jay Bookman
__________________
I'm not mean, you're just a pussy.
tharan000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-13, 01:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
pastor of muppets
 
Superfluous_Nut's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: los angeles
Age: 45
Posts: 24,663
it's a weird move to make as a single state, but i would prefer that in general, all states were to ditch the winner-take-all approach to the electoral votes.
__________________
Overwhelmed as one would be, placed in my position.
Such a heavy burden now to be the One
Born to bear and bring to all the details of our ending,
To write it down for all the world to see.

But I forgot my pen
Shit the bed again ...
Typical.
Superfluous_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-13, 02:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
Full Access Member
 
tharan000's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 11,838
The five states proposed would have given Romney the election.
__________________
I'm not mean, you're just a pussy.
tharan000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-13, 03:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
Nobody
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: WNC
Posts: 2,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superfluous_Nut View Post
it's a weird move to make as a single state, but i would prefer that in general, all states were to ditch the winner-take-all approach to the electoral votes.
and gerrymandering districts I would think need to go for that approach? And you
weavervegas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-13, 03:03 PM   #5 (permalink)
pastor of muppets
 
Superfluous_Nut's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: los angeles
Age: 45
Posts: 24,663
Quote:
Originally Posted by tharan000 View Post
The five states proposed would have given Romney the election.
actually, obama would have still won.

61 more votes for romney and 61 fewer for obama would have made it 267 to 271 for obama.

of course, it probably would have changed how they each campaigned. trying to predict how a contest would have unfolded with different rules in place isn't just a matter of applying those rules after the fact.

edit: i do think the system should include the popular state-wide vote for the 2 extra electoral college votes rather than awarding them to the person who gets the most congressional districts...
__________________
Overwhelmed as one would be, placed in my position.
Such a heavy burden now to be the One
Born to bear and bring to all the details of our ending,
To write it down for all the world to see.

But I forgot my pen
Shit the bed again ...
Typical.
Superfluous_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-13, 12:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
Full Access Member
 
T_M_Schroll's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Winnsboro, SC
Posts: 260
They could accomplish the same thing by simply ceeding Northern Virginia to D.C. What's turned the state blue is the large influx of government employees.
__________________
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery~Winston Churchill

Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views~William F. Buckley, Jr

If it sounds like Marx and acts like Stalin, it's probably Obama~a bumpersticker
T_M_Schroll is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
b&b loves supermod cock, b&bs big titties

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Want a chance to compete for an invite to the USA Baseball trials baseballx3 Baseball 0 03-28-10 04:26 PM
Cheat Sheets chipshotx Fantasy Sports Forum 4 08-16-08 10:33 AM
Local HIckory Women to compete in AMAZING RACE #6 Tonight on CBS sds70 TV & Movie Discussion 3 11-16-04 01:58 PM
Should we cheat ?? Puttingood News Of The Day & Politics 141 03-27-03 07:55 AM
2 Miss NC's to compete in Atlantic City Fred Rant & Rave 7 09-06-02 04:10 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO